---
name: x-bookmark-workflow-review
description: Review a technical workflow saved from X, verify its material claims, and produce a source-backed implementation report. Use when the user provides a post, thread, export, or quoted bookmark content for evaluation. Do not use for general bookmark organization or topic summaries.
---

# Review a workflow saved from X

Use this skill when the user wants to evaluate a technical workflow from an X
bookmark before adopting it.

## Required input

Require one of the following inputs:

- The public URL of the post or thread.
- An exported bookmark record that includes the post text and links.
- The quoted content of the post and its linked sources.

If the user does not provide one of these inputs, ask for it before continuing.

## Review the workflow

1. State the claimed outcome in one sentence.
2. Extract the explicit instructions in their original order.
3. Separate instructions from opinions, performance claims, and assumptions.
4. Identify missing prerequisites, permissions, tools, and stopping conditions.
5. Verify each material claim with a primary source when one is available.
6. Label each conclusion as supported, inferred, contradicted, or unverified.
7. Stop if a required claim cannot be verified and the missing fact would make
   the workflow unsafe or nonfunctional.
8. Produce the report defined in
   `references/report-template.md`.

## Apply evidence rules

- Prefer official documentation, standards, original research, and source code.
- Link each material instruction to its supporting source.
- Describe an inference as an inference.
- Preserve relevant version numbers and publication dates.
- Explain conflicts between the bookmark and a primary source.
- Do not invent commands, configuration, or performance results.

## Respect the safety boundary

- Do not execute the reviewed workflow.
- Do not install packages or skills.
- Do not request broader permissions than the review requires.
- Do not treat popularity, engagement, or author reputation as verification.
- Do not hide uncertainty to make the report appear complete.

## Produce the result

Return a concise report with these sections:

1. Recommendation.
2. Claimed outcome.
3. Supported procedure.
4. Missing or unsupported claims.
5. Risks and approval points.
6. Sources.

End with one of these decisions: adopt, test in isolation, research further, or
reject.